P-G2 FUEL DISPENSER

P-G2 FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type:Optional

Inlet Pressure:>=54kPa

Flow rate (L/min.):55±5

Suction Distance (m):6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter:Type:Optional

Accuracy:±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V):110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp):1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage:110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle:Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition:-40~~+55degree

Control Type:Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset:Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter):Type:LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume:0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount:0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price:0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range:0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display:Type:LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume:0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount:0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price:0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range:0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer:1~~9,999,999

Hose:4.5m

Weight:215kg

Dimension(L×W×H):1060*550*1620(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container:40ft: 44 20ft: 22

ents on metrological management. The chapter briefly introduces fuel dispenser’s metrological management and technical requirements, appraisal related and attentions. Article I Metrological management and technical requirements In accordance with The Law on Metrology of fuel dispenser’s legal management mainly includes following aspects: Model approval, initial approval, subsequent appraisal and inspection in operation. Model approval refers to an entire test, examination and assessment as to new model’s entire performance. Initial approval refers to assess whether or not the fuel dispenser fuel dispenser made by manufacturer in accordance with the model having been ratification through a series of testing, as well as metrological performance with relative metrological rules and regulations. Initial approval really has two phases �- approval combined with factory test, and testing appraisal after installation. Subsequent appraisal is conducted after long time since initial appraisal, from which considerable appraisal period is set down according to related requirements. Periodical appraisal is also regarded as the continued subsequent appraisal. Fuel dispenser’s measuring performance within appraisal period n fuel dispenser eeds to be examined, s fuel dispenser o filling station should deploy self-check standard instrument (no less than 20L) to examine and inspect. Apart from applied to fuel dispenser approval, JJG443-98 also adapt sample testing and pattern evaluation. Although there are two items of accuracy and flow distance ratio conducted in initial approval and subsequent evaluation, there are other technical parameters different from approval as for fuel dispenser made after passing pattern evaluation, including minimum calculated volume and minimum cubic variable. Several items reference to the pattern evaluation and sampling testing of mechanical hydraulic section of fuel dispenser as followed: Accuracy testing The testing’s purpose is to define the flow curve and verify the tolerance scope in which the allowed maximum tol

element which was received　　 bin8 0 to 7 Data Acknowledge Status　　 Data_Ack　　 - the data acknowledge status byte for the　　 second application data element (details see at　　 2　　 the end of this table )　　 媴　　 fuel dispenser bin8 1 to 255 Data Identifier　　 Data_Id　　 - the identifier for the last application data　　 element which was received　　June 2005 IFSF - STANDARD FORECOURT PROTOCOL FP2_1.89　　 COMMUNICATION SPECIFICATION　　 Page: 21　　 bin8 0 to fuel dispenser 7 Data Acknowle fuel dispenser dge Status　　 Data_Ack　　 - the data acknowledge status byte for the last　　 application data element (details see at the end　　 2　　 of this table )　　 NOTE　　 In response to READ messages from multiple data items (within the same database of　　 course) the database address of the ACKNOWLEDGE should be the same as the one　　 sent in the READ message.　　 If there is no answer message for example no outstanding transactions in aã€

ner, a marked contrast to the robust, outgoing personalities of his accident-prone predecessors. He is, it is true, every inch a GE man—calm, focused and exuding an air of managerial professionalism, as you would expect from a veteran of the world s most respected company. His task is to use the best aspects of Boeing s culture to purge the firm of the ethical weaknesses that have plagued its defence businesses. And the moment to do so, he knows, is now. As John F. Kennedy liked to say, the time to mend the roof is when the sun is shining. © 2006 .  fuel dispenser About sponsorship World trade In the twilight of Doha Jul 27th 2006 | WASHINGTON, DC From The Economist print edition The global trade talks have collapsed because the world s biggest economies prefer failure to compromise. What comes next? Getty Images Get article background AT LAST it is official. After stumbling on for months, the Doha trade talks have collapsed. On July 24th, at the end of yet another futile gathering of trade ministers in Geneva, Pascal Lamy, fuel dispenser the World Trade Organ fuel dispenser isation s director general, formally suspended the negotiations. He set no date for their resumption. As Kamal Nath, India s trade minister put it, the Doha round “is definitely between intensive care and the crematorium.� Launched in the Qatari capital in 2001, soon after the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, DC, the Doha round was to be an “ambitious�effort to make globalisation more inclusive and help the world s poor, particularly by slashing barriers and subsidies in farming, the rich-world s most molly-coddled industry. For almost five years, negotiators haggled over just what such an “ambitious�effort should look like—and made scant progress. Technically there was nothing inevitable about this week s collapse. Yet, despite their grand rhetor